Skip to main content

The Simpsons Gets Political - SE01 E04 - There's No Disgrace Like Home

The Simpsons Gets Political - SE01 E04 - There's No Disgrace Like Home




Script Synopsis: After a disastrous family picnic at Mr Burns mansion. Homer decides its necessary for the family to go to counselling together. He pawns the TV and they head over to Marvin Monroes Family Therapy Centre. A shocking time is had by all.

Realising that his methods aren't working Munroe terminates the therapy session - Homer reminds him that the advert promised results, or double their money back. Meaning the Simpsons get to leave to buy an even better TV - which ultimately brings them all closer together.

Issue raised: The situation where-by the Simpsons find that the only way to afford the family counselling - is to pawn the TV. And the alternative to expensive credit - mutual aid and credit unions. One of which is a theory, the second of which refers to a concrete alternative to legalised loan sharks such as Wonga.

No person, and no family, should ever find itself in the position where it is necessary to pawn their personal possessions to pay for something they consider to be essential.

Pawn shops feed on human desperation, in their traditional form the item that is traded in is put down as collateral on a loan to people with no access to another form of credit. The price paid for the item is often multiples less of what it is actually worth. Otherwise, there would be no business for the pawn broker.

The item in question can either be left at the pawn shop and the loan defaulted on with the only consequence being the loss of the item, or redeemed at a later date for the amount initially given to the original owner of the item plus an amount of interest.

This set up is far more attractive to may in desperate need of money than resorting to a loan shark - whether legal such as Wonga, or illegal such as the ones that will break ya' fingers. That does not mean that it's not a travesty that any of these are necessary.

So, what might be considered an alternative to these forms of credit?

Accepting that a wholesale bringing up of peoples living standards so that it is not possible for a family to find itself in the position that it needs to pawn possessions to pay for essentials(1) is absolutely necessary, if we are to ever claim to live in a humane society.

But, also accepting that short term solutions can be sought to improve the here and now, and that the methods we use to achieve this can offer a glimpse of how we might live in a future society - let's look at a couple of alternatives to the 'pawn shops and loan sharks' model of low-level credit.

Mutual Aid: Theory and practice.

Organisations for mutual aid exist for the provision of many goods and services, not all them monetary. They can be labour and time exchanges, social groups or any other types of exchanges that one might be able to conceptualise.

They will generally function on the principal of need. Which is to say one might give what they can afford and take what they need and they are generally democratic in nature.

How this would work should then become obvious when one thinks of the implications of this. So as an example each month me and ten of my fellow mutual aiders might put in £10 to a pot.

At some point one of the mutual aiders may lose their job and might apply to the rest for the use of the funds - they then make use of the funds in the mutual aid fund whilst they are out of work, returning to paying the £10 when they are employed again.

Each member should in principal be allowed to draw on the fund based on their present need, taking into account the needs of others.

The level of assistance afforded to the person would depend on the size of the fund and the amount that was in it when it became necessary to draw on it. But essentially you see the principal behind it.

The democracy aspect of it would prevent any one person from abusing the fund for their own ends, because they would have no power to misappropriate funds given that they only held 1/10 of the voting rights.

Credit Unions also offer a genuine solution in the here and now to every day lending needs, and they also have the advantage that if you are reading this and have not set up a mutual aid fund like the one described above - they exist and are generally fairly easy to join, as well as to find.

In the UK several organisations interested in an alternative to predatory lenders have been instrumental in their growth since the Great Recession following the crisis of 2007/8. Many of them function of the principal outlined above. All of them however try to offer a genuine ethical and affordable alternative to having to flog your tele'.

Bet Homer wishes he was a member of Springfield Credit Union or Mutual Aid Society - you can find yours here.

FIN.

----

(1) It might be a stretch to say the therapy was essential - Homer certainly thought so however.













Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Simpsons Gets Political - SE01 E05 - Bart The General

The Simpsons Gets Political - SE01 E05 - Bart The General



Script synopsis: After defending Lisa from school bully Nelson Muntz, Bart becomes Nelson's latest school bullying target. Sick of the harassment and torment, Bart, Grandpa Simpson, and Herman (a slightly deranged military antique store dealer with a missing arm) rally the town's children into fighting back against Nelson and his cronies. Ultimately forcing Nelson to sign an armistice treaty recognising Bart's right to exist and relinquishing any official power and agreeing to never again raise his fists in anger - only remaining a figure of menace in the neighbourhood.
Issue raised: Just War Theory - which claims that war, whilst generally undesirable, is not always the worst option. Furthermore, certain things can justify going to war and sets certain criteria which must be met in order to claim a war as just.
Traditional just war theory sets certain parameters with which to justify the act of declaring war (Jus ad …

On The Propaganda Model Theory of the Mass Media

Straight away my first post breaks one(1) of my rules of writing, given that the impetus for writing this comes from something I read from that denizen of rigour Nick Cohen(2). The focus of the article however will be a sympathetic reconstruction of Edward S. Herman and Noam Chomsky's 'Propaganda Model of Mass Media'. Something which admittedly, I wish had a less tin-foil hat sounding name.

As context is necessary I am going to quote from the article that prompted me to write this and briefly have a bit of a go at Nick Cohen, mainly because I sat through his book Waiting for the Etonians and want my time/money back. Alas, I am forced to settle for having a pop at him on the internet.

The rest should hopefully be transgression free, at least in so far as dem rulezzz' go(3).

I will quote in full the paragraphs I take issue with you to save you from reading the article(4). But first to head something off before it begins. I sympathise with Cohen's broader point in th…

On Folk Politics: Or why the left can't win.

On folk politics - Or, why the left can't win.
"This for the ones who said "Onwards! Comrades! Til' our deaths!" With ruin on their breath, and the weight of centuries on their tongues. Loading failed manifesto's in their guns, as if defeat repeated often enough could some day mean that they had won." 

- Pat "The bunny" Schneeweis

Where did the future go? At this point it is disturbingly clear which side of the political spectrum has successfully staked its claim in the social imaginary to notions of progress, modernisation and technology. So what is to be done?

I'll begin this as is trendy in the style of a man relating to his reader, as if he didn't hold them in the deepest contempt;

For my part I can't even join in the standard lament to be found in pieces like this one that prior to the collapse of authoritarian communism in the Eastern Bloc, at least there existed an alternative to really existing capitalism that could be used …